Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter P. Liebert, III
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1975No. 74-2294PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge:
Despite more than a decade of experience with expanded pretrial discovery in criminal cases, the extent to which it should be permitted continues to be “a complex and controversial issue.” 1 Whether pretrial discovery may be used to secure extrinsic evidence to impeach the reliability of computer printouts which are the fundament of the prosecution’s case presents an issue of first impression.
Defendant, Peter P. Liebert, III, was charged in a three-count information on December 21, 1973, with willfully and knowingly having failed to file his income…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Charles H. Grier and Isaac HarperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Arnetta WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Mohammad Ali BastanipourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.