Legal Opinion

Lind v. City of Rochester

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1972No. 43167Published

1Per curiam

Relator seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission reversing an award for compensation benefits.

The only question before us is whether the evidence sustains the commission’s finding that there was no causal relationship between relator’s heart attack and his employment. One physician testified that employment as a police officer was a cause of relator’s heart attack, and another physician testified to the contrary. In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304, 69 N. W. 2d 636, 639 (1955), we said:

«* * * [U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Golob v. Buckingham HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Murphy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Schuppel v. United Van Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API