Legal Opinion

State v. Drinkwater

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 2009No. 06C50352; A136055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for rape in the first degree. ORS 163.375. He advances four assignments of error, one of which is that the court erred in imposing a $1,000 compensatory fine as part of defendant’s sentence. We conclude that the trial court did err in imposing the fine. We reject defendant’s other assignments of error without discussion. We therefore vacate the portion of the judgment imposing a compensatory fine and remand for resentencing, but otherwise affirm.

The facts pertaining to the imposition of the fine are few and undisputed. Defendant was charged with, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. RaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BelenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. MartinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API