Federowicz v. Potomac Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
This appeal presents the narrow issue of the scope of evidence that may be introduced by an insurer in an action brought to recover under the provisions of standard fire insurance policies. Specifically it relates to that portion of the insuring agreement which provides that the company insures to the extent of the cash value of the property at the time of loss but not exceeding repair or replacement cost “ nor in any event for *332more than the interest of the insured ”. The question posed is whether the quoted language refers to the extent of the physical loss of the insured or his financial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Washington Mills Emery Manufacturing Co. v. Weymouth & Braintree Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Foley v. Manufacturers & Builders' Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Alexandra Restaurant, Inc. v. New Hampshire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Sebring v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SR International Business Insurance v. World Trade Center Properties, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Garcy Corporation v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- C-Suzanne Beauty Salon, Ltd. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Cooke v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- C-Suzanne Beauty Salon, Ltd. v. General Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.