Legal Opinion
Boyd ex rel. Mastin v. Nunez
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 2014No. 2011-CT-00444-SCTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court:
¶ 1. In this medical malpractice case, the defendant alleged the plaintiffs discovery response concerning his expert was insufficient. The trial judge ordered the plaintiff to produce the expert for a deposition but, due to illness, the expert was unable to attend the scheduled deposition. Without addressing whether the plaintiff was at *115fault for failure to comply with the court’s order to produce the expert for deposition, the trial court ordered that the expert would not be allowed to testify. The Mississippi Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Caracci v. International Paper Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Ford Motor Co. v. TenninMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Estate of Bolden ex rel. Bolden v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Boyd ex rel. Mastin v. NunezCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anthony K. Hood and Barbara L. Hood v. City of Pearl, MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021