Johnson v. University of Iowa
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LONGSTAFF, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff David Johnson brings this action asserting that defendant University of Iowa’s parental leave policy violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Iowa Civil Rights Act (“ICRA”), and the Equal Protection Clause of the Iowa Constitution. Specifically, Plaintiff asserts that the University’s parental leave policy illegally discriminates against biological fathers because it fails to provide them parental leave paid out of accumulated sick…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Godfrey v. BranstadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019