Legal Opinion
Operators' Oil Co. v. Barbre
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1933No. 781PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
Upon a trial without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees for $31,-313.84 on account of commissions alleged to have been earned for negotiating a contract for the sale of oil. The suit is upon a written contract of date January 9, 1931, which recites that the appellant on January 7th contracted in writing to sell to the Continental Oil Company a million barrels of common stock Oklahoma City crude oil, which contract was negotiated by appellee Barbre; that for the purpose of compensating him for his services in negotiating and consummating said contract…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brimmer v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Pavlantos v. GaroufalisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Continental Bus System, Inc., D/B/A Continental Rocky Mountain Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.