Legal Opinion

Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 14, 1985No. 56179, 56180Published

1Opinion of the Court

713 P.2d 572 (1985)

Bill R. MIDDLEBROOK and Melynda K. Middlebrook, Appellees,

v.

IMLER, TENNY & KUGLER, M.D.'S, INC., a corporation, Bone and Joint Orthopedics, Inc., a corporation, Robert L. Imler, M.D., and J.L. Richardson, M.D., Appellants.

Nos. 56179, 56180.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 23, 1985.

As Corrected August 14, 1985.

Rehearing Denied January 13, 1986.

Pryor, Carney & Johnson, Thomas L. Roberts, M. Randolph Barnhart, Englewood, Hopkins, King & Rucker, Don Hopkins, Mark Finnerty, Joe Francis, Best, Sharp, Thomas, Glass & Atkinson, Joseph M. Best, Joseph A. Sharp, Tulsa, for appellants.

Mi…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Opala; Dissent · Simms; Concurrence · Opala; Dissent · Simms; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API