Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Carlson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2006No. 2006-1187Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher Thomas Carlson of Wadsworth, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0062450, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1993. On October 8, 2003, we suspended respondent’s license to practice law for two years for violations of the following Disciplinary Rules: DR 5-103(A) (barring an attorney from acquiring an improper proprietary interest in a client’s case) and 5-104(A) (limiting a lawyer’s business transactions with a client). Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Carlson, 100 Ohio St.3d 134, 2003-Ohio-5073, 797 N.E.2d 55.

{¶ 2} On October 10, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BertscheOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. MoesleOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API