Legal Opinion

Bullock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2006No. 27491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

David R. Bullock (movant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of attempted statutory rape, §§ 564.011 1 and 566.032, and attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, §§ 564.011 and 573.023. See State v. Bullock, 153 S.W.3d 882 (Mo.App.2005). Following his incarceration, movant filed a motion for post-conviction relief as permitted by Rule 29.15. The motion court denied movant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. This court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.

The facts that led to movant’s conviction are recited in State v. Bullock, supra. That opinion may…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Barry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API