Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Scharlaw

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. W. M. Thompson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This is an action in case, under Section 9 of the Dramshop Act, brought by Luella Sparks against Max Scharlaw to recover damages for loss of means of support by reason of defendant’s selling intoxicating liquor to plaintiff’s husband, a teamster. The declaration contains four counts. Two of the counts aver in substance that the defendant, a saloon keeper, at various times within one year prior to the beginning of the suit, sold and g'ave intoxicating liquor to George Sparks, the husband of plaintiff, causing him to become habitually intoxicated, and that in consequence of such habitual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. SilerIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mackin v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gilchrist Transportation Co. v. Northern Grain Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. F. Reisch & Bros.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Reed v. Peoria & Oquawka RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. NavikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API