Legal Opinion

McBurney v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1955No. 35774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Ground 4 of the motion for new trial as amended is based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. There is no affidavit of counsel for the movant (defendant) attached to this ground showing that he did not know of the existence of this evidence prior to the trial of the case, and that it could not have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence; therefore, this ground cannot be considered. Code § 70-205; Callahan v. State, 209 Ga. 211, 212 (71 S. E. 2d 86); Fairburn & Atlanta Ry. &c. Co. v. Hale, 32 Ga. App. 412, 413 (123 S. E. 724).

Ground 6 complains that the trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stamps v. Newton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Callahan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Brunswick Light Co. v. GaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Dukes v. Pure Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Ellis v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. McBurney v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Wood v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API