TWO JINN, INC. v. District Court
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Chief Justice.
This appeal concerns the authority of the administrative district judge to issue regulations governing bail bond agents. We hold that the administrative district judge has authority to adopt procedural regulations, but not substantive regulations.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 12, 2007, the Plaintiffs filed this action challenging the bail bond guidelines adopted on April 16, 2004, by the Hon. Darla S. Williamson, as the Administrative District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District. The Plaintiffs are a bail bond agency licensed in the State of Idaho and two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CurringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Sharon R. Hammer v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Joshua Mason WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- TWO JINN, INC. v. District CourtIdaho Supreme Court · 2011