Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Wishnow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1985No. A14-85-163CVPublished

1Dissent

SEARS,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

Appellant attempts to distinguish Wishnow v. State, 671 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) from the case currently before us on the basis that the Court of Criminal Appeals declared the code section unconstitutionally vague to support a criminal conviction. It claims that the Wishnow order is inapplicable to an administrative order such as this one. I agree.

It is well established in Texas that no right of appeal from an action of an administrative party or appeals board exists unless expressly provided for by ordinance or statute; that right exists only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. House of Tobacco, Inc. v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Morgan v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API