Legal Opinion
Lake v. Ehrlichman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 6, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 74-887Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
This protracted litigation hopefully is nearing its conclusion. This is because on May 18, 1989, plaintiffs agreed to forego their claims for damages asserted against six individual defendants in their individual capacities.1 The only remaining defendants, who are sued in their official capacities, are the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The single remaining issue before us is the appropriate disposition to be made of the wiretap records of plaintiffs’ home telephone,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of America (Two Cases.) Melvin D. Reuber v. Food Chemical News (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Max I. Chastain v. Clarence M. Kelley, Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- John Doe v. U.S. Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Smith v. NixonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987