Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Buffington

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 7, 1987No. 86-1739-C-3; CA A42931Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

I would hold that the affidavit is sufficient and that the magistrate had a substantial basis for his decision to issue the warrant. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

When faced with an insufficiency argument, our function is to determine whether, on the basis of the facts and circumstances shown by the affidavit, a neutral and detached magistrate could conclude that there was probable cause to believe that the search would discover things specified in the affidavit in the places requested to be searched. We must construe the affidavit in a commonsense and realistic fashion. State v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API