Legal Opinion

Pipe Fitters' Local No. 392 Pension Plan v. Huddle

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 18, 1982No. C-1-81-363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO NANCY V. HUDDLE

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

This matter came on for consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment filed by defendant Nancy V. Huddle (doc. 13), Frank Elmer Huddle, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Hugh Huddle, deceased, and Marie Elizabeth Huddle (doc. 14), the reply memorandum of defendants Frank Elmer Huddle, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Hugh Huddle, and Marie Elizabeth Huddle (doc. 16), the memorandum of the Pipe Fitters’ Local No. 392, et al. (doc. 17), and the reply memorandum of Nancy V. Huddle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. In Re Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc., Bankrupt. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Benton v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnum v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Maisonet Perez v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API