Legal Opinion

Pardee v. Blanchard

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

IN ERROR to the Supreme Court. This cause was originally commenced in a Justice’s Court, and removed to the Supreme Court, by certiorari.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR to the Supreme Court. This cause was originally commenced in a Justice’s Court, and removed to the Supreme Court, by certiorari. Pardee brought an action before the justice against Blanchard, for demanding and taking from the plaintiff twelve cents and a half, as toll, for passing a toll-gate on the north branch of the Seneca turnpike, in the town of Manlius, in the county of Onondaga, with a one-horse waggon ; and for stopping the plaintiff until he had first paid the toll, contrary to the twelfth section of the act to establish a turnpike company for improving the state road from…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The plaintiff in this case sued the defendant before a justice of the peace in Onondaga county, for having demanded and taken of him twelve and a half cents, for passing a toll-gate, on the north branch of the Seneca turnpike with a one-horse waggon. The cause was tried by a jury, and on the trial the plaintiff proved that the "defendant refused to let him pass the toll-gate in Manlius, with his one-horse waggon, without the payment of twelve and a half cents, and that the plaintiff offered six cents. The only inquiry and controversy at the trial was as to the character of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. PotterNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Bartlett v. JuddNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Criss v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  4. Terry v. BerryNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  5. In re New York Institute for Deaf & DumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API