Barber v. SHINSEKI

We sua sponte withdraw our previous opinion 1 in this case and substitute the following. The only changes in this opinion are to Part II, paragraph four, in which we remove language indicating that all judgments must be set forth on paper documents. Rule 58 requires that every judgment be set forth on a separate document, but that document may be electronic. In all other respects, this opinion is the same as its predecessor.

William L. Barber, Jr., appeals, inter alia, the magistrate judge’s electronic order dismissing his case. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the order is not a…