People v. Hendricks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in sentencing defendant in the absence of an updated presentence report. The court had the benefit of a presentence report regarding defendant’s convictions following a jury trial and defendant was sentenced on all matters at the same time (see, People v Kryminski, 154 AD2d 549, Iv denied 75 NY2d 869). Moreover, defendant had been continuously confined during the two months between the jury verdict and the sentencing, and the court could be assured that there was no new relevant information presented in the interim (see,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. KryminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. GuginoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. HendricksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. HendricksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991