Legal Opinion

People v. Hendricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in sentencing defendant in the absence of an updated presentence report. The court had the benefit of a presentence report regarding defendant’s convictions following a jury trial and defendant was sentenced on all matters at the same time (see, People v Kryminski, 154 AD2d 549, Iv denied 75 NY2d 869). Moreover, defendant had been continuously confined during the two months between the jury verdict and the sentencing, and the court could be assured that there was no new relevant information presented in the interim (see,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. KryminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GuginoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. HendricksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. HendricksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API