Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Westmoreland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2007No. 3D06-2081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees, Wynn Westmoreland, William Moon, and Gerry Christensen, have moved to strike the initial brief of Appellant, Leo Greenfield, as violative of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210. We grant the motion to strike.

A cursory review of the initial brief reflects multiple violations of the appellate rules. The Statement of the Case and the Facts is unduly argumentative and contains matters immaterial and impertinent to the controversy between the parties. See Williams v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 548 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)(striking Williams’ initial brief because it was unduly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Davis v. SailsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eilert v. Whatley Living TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Plumer II v. U.S. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API