People v. Carey
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The respondent and the complainant executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent receive a private or public censure. In approving the conditional admission, an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee recommended that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1989. The conditional admission states that the respondent represented an individual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MarmonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. ATTORNEY A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. WollrabSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996