Dreifuss v. World Art Group, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.
This summary process action was brought by the lessors to recover possession of premises located at 53 Water Street, South Norwalk, *310Connecticut, for nonpayment of rent. The defendant admitted all the allegations of the complaint except as to nonpayment, which it denied, and set up as a special defense that it had mailed a check, in due time, which was lost. The issues were found for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appealed, assigning error in the court’s finding and conclusions.
The plaintiffs seek to have added to the finding a number of paragraphs of the draft finding on the ground that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Windsor Properties, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1979
- Steinegger v. FieldsConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Urban v. PrimsConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
- Mark I Enterprises, Inc. v. SendeleConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.