Kirby v. Puckett
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Lawrence Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. James E. Horton, Jr. Bill by S. E. Puckett against Monroe Kirby. Decree allowing amendment and respondent appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
.THOMAS, J.
The decree of the chancellor overruling the demurrer, to the bill as last amended is free from error.
The question then recurs to the allowance of the amendment by the chancellor, on complainant’s motion, at the February term, 1916. The decree of the chancellor sustaining the demurrer to the bill was of date October 12, 1912, It allowed complainant 30 days from the enrollment of the decree within which to amend her bill of complaint, but no amendment was offered within the time allowed. Thereafter, at the next term of the chancery court (February 28, 1916), on motion of complainant,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pitts v. PowledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Gilmer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Ex parte AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Vandeford v. StovallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Beatty v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte ConradiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Norville v. SeebergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Michael McIntyre v. Calsonic Kansei N Amer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020