Legal Opinion

Francisco Sugar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 2, 1931No. 20PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner is a New Jersey corporation, whose principal place of business is in New York; it does an extensive business in Cuba in the manufacture of sugar. Its grinding plants are there, and it has as tributary to its own land, some One hundred thousand acres, occupied and owned by Cuban peasants (“colonos”), on whose production of cane it depends for part of its supply. To secure and maintain the good will of these it has found it convenient, perhaps necessary, to act as a general merchant for their wants, holding in stock a large assortment of manufactured tools,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Anchor Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Independent I. & C. Storage Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Grant Oil Tool Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Hamilton Nat. Bank v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  4. W. C. & A. N. Miller Dev. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  5. Watts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API