Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 2000No. 2D99-4567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s order summarily denying Mary Richardson’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 because the motion is refuted by the record attached by the trial court. In her initial brief, Richardson raises an issue challenging whether the written judgment in this case comports with the oral pronouncement at sentencing. This issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal; it must initially be addressed by the trial court. Therefore, this affirmance is without prejudice to Richardson’s filing a facially sufficient…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API