Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Graves

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace. The declaration was oral and informal, and included all of the common counts in assumpsit, and especially upon an agreement in which defendant agreed to collect an insurance policy of $1,000 for half, and collected $500 through his agent, and neglected and refused to pay plaintiff his half. Also on a contract in which defendant agreed to collect, for half, a 1,000-dollar insurance policy, and an agent was employed and collected $500, and defendant settled with said agent and took a seal-skin sack, notes, etc., to plaintiff’s damage $300.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Egner v. States Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Fanset v. Garden City State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gregory v. Village of Lake LindenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API