Legal Opinion

Long v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1922No. 24,116PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTravis, J.

This is a prosecution under an indictment for bigamy under §2350 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584, §454, which indictment charges that the appellant, being married, married again, the former wife being alive and the bonds of matrimony still undissolved, and that no legal presumption had arisen of the death of his wife.

Appellant, at the age of 23 years, was married in the State of Kentucky in November, 1903, to Mary Lee Durrett, and as a result of such marriage there was born to them a daughter about three years after this marriage. Approximately all the period of his married life appellant had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State v. ArmingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Hay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. SpoorIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. CainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. United States v. KimeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Terpstra v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hickman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API