Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Ganey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 9, 1964No. 47136Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcCALEB, Judge

I concur in the rulings of the Court as to Bills of Exceptions Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9 and 10. However, as to Bills Nos. 8, 9 and 10, I concur solely on the ground that the questions propounded by the district attorney to the accused were relevant and proper because the accused, when he takes the stand in his own behalf, is like any other witness and may be cross-examined upon the whole case. See R.S. 15:462.

On the other hand, I do not agree with the ruling of the Court on Bills of Exceptions 16, 17 and 18 which assail the legality of the sentence of five years in the State Penitentiary for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HamletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API