Legal Opinion
Izzo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 27, 2006No. 05-3420UnpublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DuBOIS, District Judge.
Appellant Tina M. Izzo (“Izzo”) appeals from an order of the District Court for the District of New Jersey affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) which denied Social Security benefits. In a detailed analysis of the administrative proceedings, the District Court determined that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record. We affirm.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
Izzo was diagnosed with Lyme disease in April 1995. After an unsuccessful course of treatment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Lisa Schaudeck v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Clifton Sykes, Sr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, District of New Jersey the Honorable Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Janice Newell v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- ABDULA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- ACEVEDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- AELING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- AL-UQDAH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.