Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dandrea

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1987No. 86SA98Published

1DissentVollack, Justice

I agree with the majority’s holding that the deputy was justified in conducting a *1219pat-down search that included removing all objects from the defendant’s coat pockets. However, I disagree with the majority’s further holding that the deputy violated the protective custody statute, or the defendant’s constitutional rights, when he opened the package to identify the probable weapon. I respectfully dissent.

The majority correctly states that the purpose and rationale of the Colorado Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act [hereinafter Alcoholism Act or Act] focus on concern for the safety and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. People v. CasiasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API