People v. Dandrea
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentVollack, Justice
I agree with the majority’s holding that the deputy was justified in conducting a *1219pat-down search that included removing all objects from the defendant’s coat pockets. However, I disagree with the majority’s further holding that the deputy violated the protective custody statute, or the defendant’s constitutional rights, when he opened the package to identify the probable weapon. I respectfully dissent.
The majority correctly states that the purpose and rationale of the Colorado Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act [hereinafter Alcoholism Act or Act] focus on concern for the safety and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. CasiasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.