Legal Opinion

Moore v. Goslin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Contra Costa County.

1Opinion of the CourtHeydenfeldt, J.

Murray, C. J., concurred.

Our statute of forcible entries and detainer, provides a remedy for an unlawful entry as well as a forcible entry and the policy of it is doubtless to avoid nice distinctions as to what constitutes force in an entry upon lauds.

The case here presented, is therefore barren and naked of objections. The defendant entered into the land in controversy when, according to the evidence, it had been for more than two years in possession of the plaintiffs, had been improved by them, and at the time of the entry, in their absence, was in express charge of their agents. There…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winterfield v. StaussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Jarvis v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API