Legal Opinion
Usow v. Usow
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The complaint, in form, contains'two causes of action.
In the first cause of action so called it is alleged in substance and in fact as follows: That the Badger Raincoat Company is a Wisconsin corporation; that A. D. Usow, Jacob Briskin, and Oscar Rozoff were and are the president-treasurer, vice-president, and secretary respectively of said company; that on March 1, 1929, the plaintiff and de*397fendant A. D. Usow entered into a certain agreement of which all of the defendants at all times mentioned in the complaint had full knowledge; that pursuant to the provisions of said agreement the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank of ShullsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- McArthur v. MoffetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Emerson v. NashWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Gager v. MarsdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. P. Lorillard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- D'AMATO v. Freeman Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Dalton v. MeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Whaling v. Stone Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.