Legal Opinion

Dintelman v. McHalffey

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1968No. 53355PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

The individual defendants, Burnice B. Cates and Jones Truck Lines, Inc., appeal from an order of the trial court awarding plaintiffs a new trial (as to all parties-defendant) on the ground that the jury’s verdict was “against the weight of the evidence.” These defendants say that the court abused its discretion in awarding a new trial as to them because there was no case made by plaintiff in that Cates’ failure to sound a warning before starting to pass the vehicle in which plaintiffs were passengers was not a proximate cause of the collision. They say further that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. James v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Miller v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Mengwasser v. Anthony Kempker Trucking, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Chism v. White Oak Feed Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Friedman v. BrandesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API