Keeler v. Hollweg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Oscar E. A. Wiessner' and Jacob W. Loch, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plain- ' tiff and against said defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the llth day of Hay, 1898, upon, the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of - the court, and also from on order directing the entry of said verdict and granting an extra allowance.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
The appellants have been held liable in this action as the indorsers of a $1,500 promissory note held and! owned by the plaintiff. The payment of the. original tóete, of which the note in suit was a renewal, was secured by a chattel mortgage to the plaintiff’s -husband, which he subsequently transferred to the plaintiff. At the time of this transfer, the makers of the note executed, to the plaintiff a new chattel mortgage in place of the first one upon the same, property, and to secure payment of the same notes. The appellants claim to have been released from their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murray v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Underhill v. PalmerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indianapolis Morris Plan Corp. v. KarlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969