Black v. Herbert
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Allegan; Padgham, J. Assumpsit by Asbury Black and another against Henry Herbert for the contract price of a monument. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
On December 4, 1894, plaintiffs made a ■written contract with the defendant by which they agreed to furnish him “one monument after design Henika, of gray granite [giving the dimensions and inscriptions]; also three granite markers; the said monument to be delivered and set up in the E. Martin Cemetery, on or before May 15, 1895, or as soon thereafter as possible, in a good and workmanlike manner.” The price was $175. The other terms of the agreement are immaterial. Defendant, soon after its execution, requested some changes, *639which were agreed upon. Plaintiffs claimed that they had delivered…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American White Bronze Co. v. GilletteMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wigent v. MarrsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Wright v. Larson Bros. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924