Legal Opinion · Dissent

Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheekbank v. Hobson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1938No. 6475Published

1Dissent

MORGAN and GIVENS, JJ.,

Dissenting. — Respondent’s right of adverse possession rests upon the period of use and occupancy by Blaylock, purchaser from Will Hobson, vendee of George Hobson, and Blaylock’s own testimony clearly and unequivocally shows he never claimed to hold adversely to either of the Hobsons:

“Q. Now, how did you acquire this property, who did you negotiate with?
“A. The right-of-way, you refer to?
“Q. Yes.
“A. Well, I supposed I was in an agreement to buy the right-of-way from Will Hobson, his brother, to George.
“Q. Who did you negotiate with or deal with about this right-of-way…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Bybee v. Oregon & California RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Merryman v. BourneSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Koon v. EmpeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. QuigleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API