Legal Opinion

W.T.M. v. S.P.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 18, 2001No. 2990593, 2990655 and 2990775PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing

CRAWLEY, Judge.

The opinion of January 12, 2001, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:

The juvenile court awarded custody of three-year-old A.M.A. to her foster mother, S.P. From that judgment, the child’s father (“W.T.M.”), the child’s paternal aunt (“V.T.”), and the Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) appeal.

The parents of A.M.A. are not, and have never been, married to each other. In 1997, DHR filed a dependency petition, alleging that A.M.A., who was then an infant, was dependent because, it said, she had been born a “crack baby” and her…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. C.P. v. M.K.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. R.C. Ex Rel. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. NachmanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S.P. v. E.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. W.T.M. v. S.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. J.W. v. C.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. S.P. v. V.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. E.T. & V.T. v. S.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API