People v. Iverson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
The defendant, Gary V. Iverson, appeals from a conviction of armed robbery after a jury trial. The primary issue he raises is whether giving the so-called “Allen charge” with the initial instructions to the jury constituted reversible error. He additionally claims he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The record clearly shows defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Robert Soule, an accomplice who had already been convicted of the armed robbery, testified for the State, giving the details of the crime and stating defendant’s participation in it. While the State had agreed to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- The People v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Irven Green and Robert Benjamin Smith v. United States of America, Arnold Jack Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. BranchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People of v. PlantingaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- People v. KentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.