Legal Opinion

Farmer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1931No. 14472Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The indictment averred that while intoxicated appellant operated an automobile upon the streets in the limits of the incorporated City of Austin.

Appellant objected to oral testimony to the effect that Austin was an incorporated city, on the ground that the same was hearsay, and that the best evidence of such incorporation was the charter of said city. Appellant relies upon Poole v. State, 102 Texas Crim. Rep., 451, 278 S. W., 212, and Akin v. State, 114 Texas Crim. Rep., 343, 23 S. W. (2d) 379. We think the authorities are not controlling in the present…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blackman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Pool v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Akin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API