Legal Opinion
Stone v. Salley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 6, 1964No. 18251Published
1Opinion of the Court
244 S.C. 531 (1964)
137 S.E.2d 788
Eugene E. STONE, H. Ciremba Amick, Fred T. Mills, R.M. Hanckel, George L. Tupper, R.L. Steer, Mrs. J. Allen Lambright, W.L. Harrelson, Hampton S. Caughman, and C.G. Cushman, composing the South Carolina State Dairy Commission, Plaintiff-Respondents,
v.
Robert G. SALLEY, Sr.. a producer on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edisto Farms Dairy, Inc., a distributor, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Defendants-Respondents, and E.W. Duckworth d/b/a Duckworth's Supermarket, a Store (Retailer) on behalf of himself and all other…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Harris v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Montana Milk Control Board v. RehbergMontana Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.