Legal Opinion

Royal E. Jorgensen and Mary M. Jorgensen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1957No. 15356_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case, here on appeal from the Tax Court, involves a deficiency in federal income taxes determined by the Commissioner for the calendar year 1952,

On October 20, 1955, the Commissioner, by registered mail, sent to the taxpayers (petitioners here) a notice of deficiency. On January 23, 1956, the taxpayers filed a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination. That court dismissed the petition as untimely filed.

It appears that the postmark stamped on the envelope containing the petition was dated January 20, 1956, which was the 92nd day after the notice of deficiency had been mailed.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Di Prospero v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James E. Shipley and Patricia B. Shipley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bernard Bloch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Edward J. Healy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Tomie Kennedy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  5. Heaberlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API