Legal Opinion

Waltz v. Chevrolet Motor Division

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 20, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by Defendants in an action to recover the price of an automobile purchased by Plaintiffs from the Defendant Colonial which had in turn purchased it from the manufacturer, Defendant General Motors. Plaintiffs assert that the vehicle is defective in that it will not tow their horse trailer without being subject to extraordinary movements which make the vehicle unsafe to operate. Several months after the vehicle was delivered in October 1971, Plaintiffs experienced the difficulty. Thereafter numerous contacts were made with Defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marbelite Co. v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Fablok Mills, Inc. v. COCKER MACHINE & FOUNDRYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Beardmore Suburban Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Liarikos v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Ed Fine Oldsmobile, Inc. v. KnisleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Freedman v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Olmstead v. General Motors Corp., Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API