On Time Aviation, Inc. v. Bombardier Capital, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff On Time Aviation, Inc. (“On Time”) appeals from awards of (1) summary judgment in favor of defendant Bombardier Capital, Inc. (“Bombardier”), and (2) sanctions against On Time’s counsel under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.
We review an award of summary judgment de uovo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Mathirampuzha v. Potter, 548 F.3d 70, 74 (2d Cir.2008). We will…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Simmons v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.