Legal Opinion
United States v. Miguel Suarez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 23, 1991No. 90-5398PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Convicted of firearms violations, defendant Miguel Suarez appeals (1) the Government’s refusal to provide him with the location of a confidential informant, alleging that the Government’s negligent concealment of the informant’s whereabouts violated his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process of witnesses, and (2) the district court’s imposition of sentence based on an upward departure from the prescribed guideline range, alleging that the district court failed to sufficiently articulate its reasons for the departure. We affirm.
Sixth Amendment Claim
On November…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Felino RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Ehrlichman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Sidney Francis MourningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert Dale Hart, United States of America v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De VaronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Malcolm E. McVayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- State v. FlorezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- United States v. Cary BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Chris Warren NilsenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.