Ridge Care, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
This Court is bound by its prior decisions and must hold that DHHS was authorized to enter into a settlement agreement with Carillon in 2007. Where the 2000 and 2007 Settlement agreements were outside of the CON Law, petitioners’ constitutional challenges must fail. The Attorney General was not required to execute the 2007 Settlement Agreement. Petitioners have failed to demonstrate prejudice.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In 1997, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted a law that imposed a moratorium on the development of adult care home (“ACH”) facilities. Under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Britthaven, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Parkway Urology, P.A. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Tice v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Carillon Assisted Living, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC v. N.C. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014