Legal Opinion

Ridge Care, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2011No. COA10-1316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

This Court is bound by its prior decisions and must hold that DHHS was authorized to enter into a settlement agreement with Carillon in 2007. Where the 2000 and 2007 Settlement agreements were outside of the CON Law, petitioners’ constitutional challenges must fail. The Attorney General was not required to execute the 2007 Settlement Agreement. Petitioners have failed to demonstrate prejudice.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In 1997, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted a law that imposed a moratorium on the development of adult care home (“ACH”) facilities. Under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Britthaven, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Parkway Urology, P.A. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Tice v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Carillon Assisted Living, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC v. N.C. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API