Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. City of Everett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1957No. 34141PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The trial court held that plaintiff’s second amended complaint did not state a cause of action. De fendants’ demurrer having been sustained, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice.

January 21, 1928, plaintiff became a member of the Everett fire department. After more than twenty-five years of service, he retired voluntarily on October 1, 1953. For more than one year preceding his retirement, he held the rank of assistant chief at a salary of $390 per month. At the time of retirement, plaintiff had not attained the age of fifty-five years. He has received a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Traverse City v. Township of BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re Adoption of LybbertWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State Ex Rel. Heavey v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API