Parkhurst v. City of Everett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The trial court held that plaintiff’s second amended complaint did not state a cause of action. De fendants’ demurrer having been sustained, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice.
January 21, 1928, plaintiff became a member of the Everett fire department. After more than twenty-five years of service, he retired voluntarily on October 1, 1953. For more than one year preceding his retirement, he held the rank of assistant chief at a salary of $390 per month. At the time of retirement, plaintiff had not attained the age of fifty-five years. He has received a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Traverse City v. Township of BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by20 opinions
- > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Adoption of LybbertWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Heavey v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.