Legal Opinion

State v. Shinn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2013No. SD 31919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

A jury found James Douglas Shinn (“Defendant”) guilty of the attempted forcible rape of his estranged wife (“Victim”). See section 566.030.1 After hearing evidence at the subsequent penalty phase of the trial, the jury recommended a six-year sentence. The trial court subsequently denied original and supplemental motions for a new trial and entered a judgment of conviction that imposed the six-year sentence recommended by the jury.

Defendant now appeals, claiming the trial court committed reversible error by: 1) imposing its six-year sentence based upon a “mistaken belief’ that it was bound by…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. State v. SkillicornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES ROBERT CROCKERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Carroll v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Jeremey Beard v. Nicholas Alexander Frasier, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API