Legal Opinion

People v. Honaker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1991No. 91SA35PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, a hearing board of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee recommended that the respondent, Jimmie Joe Honaker, be publicly censured and assessed the costs of these proceedings. The disciplinary counsel filed an objection to the hearing board’s recommendation, arguing that the respondent’s misconduct warranted suspension for no less than thirty days. Thereafter, a hearing panel of the Grievance Committee approved the findings of fact and recommendation of the hearing board. We. subsequently issued an order to the respondent to show cause why more severe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FitzkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HonakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. HonakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API