Wileman v. Wade
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentSparling, Justice
I do not agree with the rationale of the majority opinion regarding the judgment in installments, and I dissent to the majority’s holding the appellees jointly liable. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.
The Installment Judgment
The threshold question, unaddressed by the majority, is whether the recovery sought by appellant is for damages as a third party creditor or as attorney’s fees prescribed by TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 11.18 (Vernon Supp.1982):1
Costs(a) In any proceeding under this subtitle, including, but not limited to, habeas corpus, enforcement, and contempt proceedings, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cockerham v. CockerhamTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Fowler v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Douthit v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Parker v. SchmeltekopfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Carter v. LeiterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.