Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wileman v. Wade

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 15, 1983No. 05-82-00729-CVPublished

1DissentSparling, Justice

I do not agree with the rationale of the majority opinion regarding the judgment in installments, and I dissent to the majority’s holding the appellees jointly liable. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.

The Installment Judgment

The threshold question, unaddressed by the majority, is whether the recovery sought by appellant is for damages as a third party creditor or as attorney’s fees prescribed by TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 11.18 (Vernon Supp.1982):1

Costs(a) In any proceeding under this subtitle, including, but not limited to, habeas corpus, enforcement, and contempt proceedings, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cockerham v. CockerhamTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Fowler v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Douthit v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Parker v. SchmeltekopfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Carter v. LeiterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API